The PTP detent was superior to the wire detents offered on mags at the time, and the "no detent" (or wire if you paid a premium) on cockers. It was also an upgrade compared to the "magic fingers" on the VM68 and M98... Should they have updated to thread-in ball detents for the MM2000? Perhaps, but I'd imagine they had a lot of their detents on the shelf to use, and it was one of their signature products. All of their markers other than the 2K9 predate common use of modern rubber nub detents, and at the time the 2K9 was released, the screw-in detents they used were a dated technology.
As for "issues" with previous products, I don't recall having any more than I did with other similar products, and I've owned 50+ Micromags and 20+ PTP cockers... I'll admit, I'm a fan, but if there was truly a widespread tolerance issue I'm sure I would have encountered it at least once. The only issues I found were some need for sanding/honing to use L10 bolts in the mag bodies (which came out before the L10 existed, can you fault them?) and the tendency for Micrococker backblocks/sleds to wear out around the threaded section and the cocking slot.
As for "issues" with previous products, I don't recall having any more than I did with other similar products, and I've owned 50+ Micromags and 20+ PTP cockers... I'll admit, I'm a fan, but if there was truly a widespread tolerance issue I'm sure I would have encountered it at least once. The only issues I found were some need for sanding/honing to use L10 bolts in the mag bodies (which came out before the L10 existed, can you fault them?) and the tendency for Micrococker backblocks/sleds to wear out around the threaded section and the cocking slot.












Comment