GI is suing Valken and APX saying the companies are violating their (originally PMI) patent on Marballizer.

GI was awarded an injunction stopping Valken from selling the said paint till the case is ended, Valken has settled in a former case which is not a good thing for them.
GI was denied an injunction for the same against APX, which has the best chance as they've never been sued or settled with GI.
Like Tom said, same people acting the same.
Such a vague patent should not have been granted.
Next thing you know there'll be a one color ball and a two color ball patent and everyone will be paying alimony to the 800 lb gorilla in the corner.
This will give you an idea why the suit was filed in Texas:

GI was awarded an injunction stopping Valken from selling the said paint till the case is ended, Valken has settled in a former case which is not a good thing for them.
GI was denied an injunction for the same against APX, which has the best chance as they've never been sued or settled with GI.
Like Tom said, same people acting the same.
Such a vague patent should not have been granted.
Next thing you know there'll be a one color ball and a two color ball patent and everyone will be paying alimony to the 800 lb gorilla in the corner.
This will give you an idea why the suit was filed in Texas:




Comment