Hybrid has a Bad Day

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chefstevie
    CCM PUMPER
    • Oct 2004
    • 1025

    #106
    .

    Originally posted by WARPED1
    Boy, IOI works quick. Try going to Hybrids site............ http://www.hybrid-paintball.com/

    wow thats great i cant wait till theyre sued...just to piss pbn and yakitroi off
    AO Feedback
    Ebay Feedback

    Comment

    • 68magOwner
      Registered User
      • May 2003
      • 3475

      #107
      No, what hybrid was doing wasnt right by any means (illegally selling stuff with someone elses tradmarked characters on it)

      But, going out of your way for the sole purpose of potentially damaging anyone (in this case, a company) is just something that dosent seem right to me either. I mean, you took effort to go track down people for the sole purpose of turning in hybrid. Now, i cant say what you did was wrong in ANY was, but, isnt a respectable thing to do IMO.

      Comment

      • WARPED1
        I'm a pirate, ARRRRRRRRRR!
        • Nov 2001
        • 7458

        #108
        Originally posted by yakitori
        ^^^ that doesnt mean anything.

        Someone please show me some substantial evidence that there is a lawsuit in action against them.

        Please show me some better info other than a lousy email and an organization of sausages rallying behind some internet clown calling everyone stupid that disagrees w/ them.

        Please someone, show me something more than whats already been shown to prove your allegations. Nobody has.

        and trust me, the stupidity of ppl here is pushing me to stay on another site. Its turning into a saugage festival of angry name calling morons. Have I called one person here an Idiot before Ive been called names? And youre the "mature" audience.
        I'm just assuming, could be down for anything. But awful suspicious it happened right after this thing blew up.
        [Something Cool is Here]

        Comment

        • Lohman446
          Useful posts: 7
          • Jun 2003
          • 9315

          #109
          Originally posted by yakitori
          ^^^ that doesnt mean anything.

          Someone please show me some substantial evidence that there is a lawsuit in action against them.

          Please show me some better info other than a lousy email and an organization of sausages rallying behind some internet clown calling everyone stupid that disagrees w/ them.

          Please someone, show me something more than whats already been shown to prove your allegations. Nobody has.

          and trust me, the stupidity of ppl here is pushing me to stay on another site. Its turning into a saugage festival of angry name calling morons. Have I called one person here an Idiot before Ive been called names? And youre the "mature" audience.
          You were called names after you called SBF a weasel - sorry that it came around on you.
          You can deny that, its like denying the blatant copy those grips are. Good luck on that idiot.
          "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr Suess

          Comment

          • SCpoloRicker
            HA HA I'm custom!!1
            • Jan 2004
            • 4375

            #110
            See the interesting thing is that when SBF, Lohman, myself, or any other number of solid people disagree, we manage to do so civily.

            :)
            God....I guess I was probably returning videotapes.

            Comment

            • phantomhitman
              ao's official bad guy
              • Oct 2003
              • 1841

              #111
              slarty, clear your pms please. i am trying to contact you.....
              my feedback
              countdown on devilmag day........ill let you now

              Comment

              • Lohman446
                Useful posts: 7
                • Jun 2003
                • 9315

                #112
                Originally posted by SCpoloRicker
                See the interesting thing is that when SBF, Lohman, myself, or any other number of solid people disagree, we manage to do so civily.

                :)

                I don't think any of us are dense enough to look at those grips and that picture and deny the near direct copy though. Stand where you will on the use of intellectual property without permission, or Slarty contacting people in regards to it, but don't try arguments that hold NO logical value. There actually are arguments that exist that would support the free use of intellectual property.
                "Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. Its not" - Dr Suess

                Comment

                • Eric Cartman
                  []*[]
                  • Apr 2003
                  • 779

                  #113
                  Originally posted by yakitori
                  A company suing a company is one thing, but Im bringing the lawyers to slartys door since he has to be that way.
                  Even Lionel Hutz wouldn't touch that case!

                  Originally posted by yakitori
                  so you too partake in the libel and deformation of character ...


                  Remember that In Living Color skit where Damon Wayans played the convict who threw around the big words that he couldn't pronounce or define? "I would like to flagellate the urethral clitoli" LOL good times!
                  Eric Cartman

                  Respect my authoritah!

                  Comment

                  • minimag03
                    WVU paintball #19
                    • Dec 2003
                    • 2214

                    #114
                    No one cared when small companies were devastated by SP's sueing. I don't think any of those companies even knew that SP had the patent.

                    Now Hybrid is in the same position as the small companies that SP sued. The only difference is that it's hard to have sympathy for Hybrid because they KNEW what they were doing.
                    My AO Feedback

                    Comment

                    • phantomhitman
                      ao's official bad guy
                      • Oct 2003
                      • 1841

                      #115
                      Originally posted by Lohman446
                      There actually are arguments that exist that would support the free use of intellectual property.
                      Are you saying some people think its legal to use a intellectual property work and get away with it? I hope people are not that stupid or misinformed were they think they can get away with, or just think it is ok to share, others peoples work.


                      I can tell you that ip of an image (for example) will hold up in a court and gives you alot of credibility if you want to pursue people infringing on your work. In fact, if you documented your work with name and date that is about all you can do with images or ideas until an actual deal is worked out or an item is created. You cannot patent an image, because a patent more or less covers working products. It is very had to get a registered or trademarked image also because of the lenghty paperwork and money involved. IP is about as far as you can go with an image.

                      I still await hybrid response to this.
                      my feedback
                      countdown on devilmag day........ill let you now

                      Comment

                      • Pha|anx
                        PB United / Euro Freelance
                        • May 2005
                        • 1073

                        #116
                        Originally posted by minimag03
                        The only difference is that it's hard to have sympathy for Hybrid because they KNEW what they were doing.
                        Knew what the are doing? At first when I started reading this thread I didn't compare anything.



                        Look at his forehead, do you see the shadows? They are identical in location.

                        Possibly the most blatent(sp?) copy I have seen in a long time.

                        Comment

                        • oldsoldier
                          just choke yourself out!!!
                          • Feb 2002
                          • 2459

                          #117
                          Copies dont have to be exact. A close likeness (so that the average person can make a logical connection) is all thats needed to be an infringement.
                          X-mag #10. Nuff said.

                          my feedback

                          Comment

                          • stop whining buy a mag
                            I know what I'm doing!
                            • Sep 2004
                            • 414

                            #118
                            Yak, I'm still confused as to why you are defending Hybrid. They blatantly have broken the law. The comparisons in this thread show that the images are exactly the same. This is not the only image they are copying. They will lose if IOI files a lawsuit.

                            SBF contacting IOI is not unethical in any way. He was simply curious as to whether Hybrid was allowed to use those images. He got his answer and showed the hardworking folks at IOI that someone was stealing from them.

                            When Lohman, SC, Carbon, and everyone else call you an idiot, you're probably an idiot. IMO they are among the top 10 smartest people on AO.

                            Comment

                            • yakitori

                              #119
                              Im saying that w/ the little info that has played out on PBN and AO about the grips, its thanksgiving holiday, and the company (hybrid) is closed. The german one IOI may not be since they dont share the joyess american holiday as hybrid does. Slarty has provided very little info about anything, but an email between himself and one rep at the IOI company which may or may not be accurate. Ever called a company to get something done on multiple occasions and get multiple stories. How do you konw its not like that? Has anyone seen any official press release about them from either company. Everyone is getting their painties in a wad cause Im not jumping on the AO bandwagon with so little info that has been presented about it. ANd its not cool to snitch, and its not cool to go on public forums accusing a company that has not be officially accused of anything as far as its been released by anyone saying they STOLE something. It may be a direct copy. What if the rep made a mistake and did have some agreement w/ hybrid about it. Then youve accused hybrid publicly and on a mass scale of a crime that hasnt been committed, then youll be guilty of libel.

                              Thats all Im saying. You ppl seem to think grips are all they make. And HYBRID DOESNT MAKE BRUCE LEE GRIPS>>>>>>>BUNKERKING DOES. You are even pinning things on them that they didnt do. More libel. You are trying to damage their business and purposefully because you believe they have done a immoral act that nobody has proved yet.

                              and Im the idiot? At least Im not able to see the future. A gift that many of you are displaying right now.

                              Comment

                              • Carbon
                                Word!
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 1589

                                #120
                                Originally posted by stop whining buy a mag
                                When Lohman, SC, Carbon, and everyone else call you an idiot, you're probably an idiot. IMO they are among the top 10 smartest people on AO.
                                whoa there. I didnt explicitly call him an idiot! nor did i alude to it.
                                Yak granted you have not jumped on the "AO Bandwagon", but the logic of the whole infringement issue is clear and obvious.

                                Granted you greatly disagree with SBF's actions and some of us understand that. I know the difficulty of playing devils advocate. Hell, i hate paying taxes, but like a chump i still do. Im not here to call anyone an idiot. At this point, we are out of the realm of opinions and into an area of established, factual and enforced laws.

                                As we know so far, IOI did not give Hybrid permission the use of the art.

                                Yak, apply the situation to a scenario where it subjugates you as the damaged party. That is, what if some was ripping off your artwork.

                                Slarty has provided very little info about anything, but an email between himself and one rep at the IOI company which may or may not be accurate. Ever called a company to get something done on multiple occasions and get multiple stories. How do you konw its not like that? Has anyone seen any official press release about them from either company.
                                I understand where you are coming from. In all technicality everyone is guessing the outcome for discussion's sake. Understand, some of us draw our conclusions based on the "facts at hand" and the next logical step. If in fact Hybrid used the images without consent of IOI, IOI can infact, at the least issue a C&D.

                                As i see it there are several facets of thought behind this. But as you do realize, the issue is clear as day.

                                Anyway, [/verbal masturbation]

                                ...ever in the continual search of time dilation.

                                Emag 4.0 "I love the way you turn me on"

                                Comment

                                Working...