The French are Evil!

[FactsOfLife]

Originally posted by 1stdeadeye


And you fought in which unit again?

You have the right to speak for Vietnam veterans like I have the right to speak of Militant Lesbian Soccor Moms (kind of like Rosie O'Donnell)!

At least Bush served in the national guard. He did not run away like Clinton and hide in London bad mouthing the US! Hey, Bill was the Dixie Chicks forerunner!

As for the sig, Come on Facts. You can do better then that. How about Michael Dukakis in the tank? Now there is a funny picture!

Oh you mean "The Loser".

[aaron_mag]

Yeah that is true. Dukakis is a loser for serving in the army while GW Bush is a hero for serving in the national guard. Does support for former service men depend on what party the are part of?

[FactsOfLife]

Originally posted by aaron_mag
Yeah that is true. Dukakis is a loser for serving in the army while GW Bush is a hero for serving in the national guard. Does support for former service men depend on what party the are part of?

Nope, Dukakis is a loser for having his butt handed to him the election.

The fact that he served isn't germain to me calling him that.

And NO, it make zero difference to me what party a servicemen is in. They still get the support they deserve.

That Dukakis took his chances and went Liberal Democrat is his problem.

Bush is a hero because he, unlike a certain President immediately prior to him, says what he means and does what he says he's going to do. He did what a President is suppposed to do first and foremost. Protect this country from any threat foreign or domestic.

The fact that he's been right about nearly everything in his Presidency so far, is no doubt galling to The Boy.

And that's icing on the cake.

[1stdeadeye]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fool!

Originally posted by Collegeboy


Moscow was laid siege not to the extent of Leningrad or Stalingrad, but ti was laid siege.

Siege: A military blockade of a city or fortified place to compel it to surrender. (Webster's 9th New Collegiate Dictionary)

Moscow was attacked, not laid siege to!

We beat Japan, we did not conquer Japan. And no the French did not roll over, they lost, but they went down fighting.

We were not trying to conquer the Japanese. However an unconditional surrender comes pretty darn close. Our goal was to defeat the Japanese, not enslave them. Your arguement is thusly moot!

Some French went down fighting. Some fled to fight another day. Some capitualed far too easy. *cough* Vichy French *cough*. DeGaulle was a hero, French or otherwise. Mitterand(deceased) and Chirac are morally bankrupt cowards!

That is not the point. My statement was that the US went into France only when the Germans were weekend by the Russians. This is true.

No it isn't. American Bombers destroyed Germany's industrial base, not the Russians. American bombers made resupply of German Armies impossible, not the Russians.

Hey Randy Moss scored the touchdown. All Dante Culpepper did was throw him a 50 yard pass!

Bosnia was sanctioned by NATO, it was a multilateral agreement with the backing of the UN.

Uhm, the UN did not back Bosnian intervention. That is the reason the US had to unilaterally intervene. Nato did not sanction Bosnia until after the fact!

No my father is not from France, he was born there, how many times do I have to say this.

Born in France=French!

Why didn't the US step in when Poland was invaded?

We were not bound by a treaty to do so as Britan and France were. This is kind of like Korea now. If NK invades SK, the US is bound by a treaty to defend SK! Not to tough to figure out, eh?

[FactsOfLife]

And for any of you wondering exactly what The Loser did during his tour:

He served for two years in the United States Army, sixteen months of which he spent with the Support Group to the UN Delegation to the Military Armistice commission in Munsan, Korea.


Figures.

[1stdeadeye]

No

Originally posted by aaron_mag
Yeah that is true. Dukakis is a loser for serving in the army while GW Bush is a hero for serving in the national guard. Does support for former service men depend on what party the are part of?

No, it is not based on party. It is based on the fact that Dukakis looked like a weenie in that picture, that is all.

Look at it! He is not a presidential candidate, he is weenie-man!

[FactsOfLife]

for The Boy

in case you wanted something to go with that cheap French Whine...

[superdesk2007]

Just because you don't win a battle doesn't mean it isn't an offensive battle. (yeah I know double negative :P )

I will get to the rest when i get back. he will keep pursuing this subject


Excuse my brother, for he will keep pursuing this subject.

WILL HIM AND YOU STOP THIS I WANT TO READ SOMETHING BY DIFFERENT PEOPLE??????????AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I KNOW MY SPELLING SUCKS BUT IM NOT EVEN IN HIGH SCHOOL SO DON'T CRITISIZE PEOPLE.

[aaron_mag]

Originally posted by FactsOfLife
And for any of you wondering exactly what The Loser did during his tour:

He served for two years in the United States Army, sixteen months of which he spent with the Support Group to the UN Delegation to the Military Armistice commission in Munsan, Korea.


Figures.

1stdeadeye can you please explain to Facts here why celebrating one person as a national guardsman and deriding another because he was stationed just for sixteen months in Korea is hypocritical. :)

[Collegeboy]

This is how my father puts the Bush vs. Clinton military service argument. He said both men dishonored those who died to fight for a lost cause or no cause at all. He said that out of them at least Clinton stood up for what he believed in, he broke the law, but didn't hide his emotions to the war. Bush was scared to fight, he ran and joined the NG in order to make sure that he will not get drafted or will not go to war. He even went awol while on duty. Along with the AWOL issue the thing that pissed my father the most was when Bush during his election said he wanted to go to war, but since the NG unit never got called up he couldn't. Anyone who knows anything will know that Bush joined the NG because he knew they wouldn't get called up. He has disgraced all the Vietnam dead and living who had the guts to fight, while he didn't and proclaims he does.
I have to agree with that to a certain extent.


FOL, you have never answered my question, so don't state that you have. And since you posted the question again I will ask you again.

When did Iraq ever pose a threat to the US?

[shartley]

[Collegeboy]

Originally posted by shartley

No NG units deserve just as much respect as any other soldier. But Bush didn't join the NG to protect our nation incase it was invaded (For that was and still is a ludicrous idea). He joined that unit for he was afraid to go to war, he knew it wasn't going to get assigned and he could always say that he served his country. Even though he did go AWOL.

[shartley]

Originally posted by Collegeboy


No NG units deserve just as much respect as any other soldier. But Bush didn't join the NG to protect our nation incase it was invaded (For that was and still is a ludicrous idea). He joined that unit for he was afraid to go to war, he knew it wasn't going to get assigned and he could always say that he served his country. Even though he did go AWOL.

[FactsOfLife]

Originally posted by Collegeboy

FOL, you have never answered my question, so don't state that you have. And since you posted the question again I will ask you again.

When did Iraq ever pose a threat to the US?

What part of "I'm done answering your inane questions" are you having difficulty understanding?

And here you say you're in college.

BTW, enjoy the cheese.

[Collegeboy]

Originally posted by FactsOfLife


What part of "I'm done answering your inane questions" are you having difficulty understanding?

And here you say you're in college.

BTW, enjoy the cheese.

Then stop making the statement that Iraq posed a threat to the US. If you can not asnwer the question of how they did so, don't make the statement.

To Shartly.

There are numerous sites out there, all of them bias of course, that show the peculiarities of Bush's military "service."

Here is just one of them.

http://www.realchange.org/bushjr.htm#vietnam

They are bias so should be taken with a grain of salt. Look at the evidence and skip the opinions.

My ID card comes from my father, he is retired from the army after 30 years in service, 5 of which was in Vietnam