AO: We are back from the dead... again! After an 18 day outage, we are finally alive and well. Who knew how complicated updating software/databases from 2008 would be. I still have alot of tweaks to make, but my main goal was getting everything patched and updated to 2026.
Vbulletin 6 has changed alot since 2008 so we will have a ton of new features to dig into.
It this project dead/failure? Seems like we haven't had a update in a while
How is the air efficietency compared the pneumag? Thats the biggest drawback for me. I was thinking about making a pneumag but 500 shots on a 88ci 4500 PSI tank doesnt cut it for me.
500 shots???
wow. no.. The hAir triggers we built only used energy equal to about 3 to 4 shots from a 68/4500.. in otherwords, you should not notice an air useage difference.
500 shots???
wow. no.. The hAir triggers we built only used energy equal to about 3 to 4 shots from a 68/4500.. in otherwords, you should not notice an air useage difference.
hmmmm... I was going through the Pneumatic Trigger Frame thread and someone mentioned it was a gas hog but "isn't a big deal because my field has all day air"
hmmmm... I was going through the Pneumatic Trigger Frame thread and someone mentioned it was a gas hog but "isn't a big deal because my field has all day air"
Mags in general are often labled 'gas hogs' even though they really arent that bad on air.
Anyway, if adding a ram made a gun less efficient, cockers would be horrible on air and we know they arent.
Then why do more people put there Chevy engine into a Ford, if Ford's are ****, they would have bought a Chevy in the first place. DUH!
Because the Chevy engines perform better and are made with better quality. Not that American automobiles have that great quality in general, but Ford is definitely the worst.
Anyhoo, this mod looks extremely interesting. I am super excited to see how it turns out. As for life getting in the way of fun, I hear ya lol.
Well, to bring myself into this whole discussion, I would like to say that this idea is amazing. I personally wouldn't do it because I am a battery Nazi (hate batteries on paintball guns) and I would rather either get a normal Pneumag, but that doesn't mean much. I personally don't think this will work by looking at the size pictures. I sure hope you can prove me wrong, for I would love to see that.
As far as the Pneumag goes, obviously it is gonna lower the efficiency by some, but if you look at the pressure differances, you could figure it out. You have 850 psi going into the valve to run the marker (and probably getting regulated to somewhere between 250-450 psi) while the LPR would be regulating out 40-50 psi. Big differance there. I doubt the differance will be that big, maybe somewhere between 20-50 shots on a good 68/4500, but that is just my own estimate.
On a bad day, running about 60psi on the pneumatic trigger, You will burn about 1.5cilb of energy. A 68/45 tank holds 306000cilb of energy.
If you are getting 1200 shots off your mag before, that is burning about 255cilb per shot.
so, 1200*1.5cilb wasted with the pneumatic trigger= 1800cilb used, or about 7 shots less.
This is assuming a really crappy valve/ram setup and a plunger that is moving prolly too far for the sear.
Like I said... 3 to 4, maybe 5 shots fewer on a good setup.
Comment